true story: this is all my fault. i proposed a series of conference papers on melania’s jacket and so OF COURSE now there is story on melania’s jacket every single effing day.
oh hello. i know, i know. long time no words. forgive me. in a life of approximately 9,000,000,000 projects (give or take a few), it is sometimes hard to remain a word factory in all available venues. but yo, i’m back! the world is a pit of drear and suck. let’s talk about totally superficially […]
today, class, a close reading of the DM’s article of 16 february 2018, entitled: “Sisters who competed to snare the world’s richest men: Schooled by their mother to seek out power, a new book reveals the jealousy between Jackie O and sister Lee and how they both bedded JFK.” i mean, just right there, yeah?
HEY-O. you remember our old friends, butofcourse 🙂
so what about leo?
yaaaaaaaaa’ll, remember the sex lives of dead people: jfk edition (emotions via britney)? remember jerry oppenheimer? let’s refresh.
i mean, i had you at hello, right? you are like, holy moses, this woman is ambitious. for seriously, is there a more prodigious sex life of a dead person than that of JFK? haven’t we all of us, by this point, slept with JFK? ok. so that’s taking it a step too far. but […]
so i have been putting this off for daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaays because, HOLY MOSES… i don’t even know. i mean, that has captured your attention, non? you are RIVETED, right? let’s dive in.
please know: in my efforts to find photos from the launch of selfish to illustrate what i’m about to write about selfish, i just saw SO.MUCH.KIM.KARDASHIAN. her instagram is A LOT, yo. so i’mma call on my emotionally incontinent face celebrity double britney to ease us all in.
YOU GUYS. i read the daily mail on the regular because it’s pretty much where all gossip stories start. so i’m aware of the mail’s howshallwesay… COLOSSAL PROBLEMS. but every now and again, there’s an especially egregiously awful article for which britney is required to express the resulting spectrum of emotions. and yesterday, that was this: which […]