and, lo, we meet again.
surely, SURELY we are deep enough in our daily mail master class to recognize that the man behind the curtain has no clothes, right?
but yeah, anyhoo, here we are at exhibit ZZZ…
given that the daily mail almost EXCLUSIVELY pedals in a genre perhaps best described as News From Elsewhere (with the exception of their EXCLUSIVE EXCLUSIVES which always have EXCLUSIVE plastered all over them so they are adequately distinguished from the pack of unoriginal content), i don’t know why i always give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that their articles are doing something other than killing time.
this article, my friends? this thing is seriously killing time. Continue reading
GRAB ME MY SMELLING SALTS.
an extraordinary day has come.
ok, ya’ll, let’s do this. and to do this we (obviously) need my emotionally incontinent face twin, ms britney.
a lot has happened since we last spoke.
for example, the new york times published this piece on harvey weinstein.
the new yorker published this substantially less well written piece on harvey weinstein.
the new yorker published a follow-up story on harvey weinstein.
the new york times published a follow-up story on harvey weinstein.
there was some exceedingly valuable writing on the matter from all over the internet which i will not even attempt to condense here.
buzzfeed published this piece on kevin spacey.
assorted other venues posted articles on kevin spacey.
so, like an amazingly enormous amount of stuff happened. but we’re not here to talk about that. Continue reading
yaaaaaaaaa’ll, remember the sex lives of dead people: jfk edition (emotions via britney)?
remember jerry oppenheimer?
let’s refresh. Continue reading
so this was the year that i realized my interest in the met ball has entirely to do with sarah jessica parker’s presence at the met ball (i literally just wrote “at the mall” just then). i realized this when i realized that, this year, sarah jessica parker wasn’t present and my level of care promptly plummeted.
you know who was there though? caroline kennedy.
and you know what? she kind of brought it SJP-style. which is a fact, my feelings about which remain uncertain.
i’m a little wary of being arrested for copyright infringement, so let’s play a game.
i’mma recreate her look based upon the description provided by our (wo?)man on the street: MR/MS DAILYMAIL.COM REPORTER. Continue reading
so this first caught my eye because of the horrible HTML error.
which i briefly believed to be an accurate portrayal of a company’s brand name.