a random appreciation of iris apfel and an accidental continuation of the discourse on fashion exhibits

do you know iris apfel?

iris-apfelyou should, because she is amaze.

born in new york, she worked for women’s wear daily, helped with white house restorations in eight presidential administrations, and has a personal wardrobe legendary enough to warrant its own exhibition…

IrisApfel2.JPG

iris apfel: rare bird of fashion, @ nassau county museum of art, may-september 2008

an exhibition that looks equally compelling as that recently mounted in honor of isabella blow.

isabella3

isabella blow: fashion galore, @ somerset house, london fall 2013-winter 2014

which leads me to wonder if the whimsy of these exhibitions really is entirely dependent upon the whimsy of the personality/person at the core.

3448680_325e6afabaccaff411ccef995f4ea4a7_wm

or maybe, to push that further, the person we allow the person to be.

if we judge the cultural currency of a celebrity image by magazine covers (which, i would argue, is an excellent barometer), here is where we are with jackie…

jackie-kennedy-people-magazine

Screen Shot 2013-10-10 at 4.20.08 PM

October-2009 jackie-kennedy-people

those are the most recent. this is 1994:

Screen shot 2014-03-19 at 9.31.58 AM

notice a trend? it’s not just us americans either. the french appear equally enamored of the yellow dress photo shoot, though they’ve allowed a slightly larger range of expression…

Screen shot 2014-03-19 at 9.33.59 AM

so we like our jackie silent and mysterious. very like a certain someone else…

JFKWHP-AR7650-L

and we really really like her in that yellow dress.

articles like this make it into the guts of the magazine, not onto the cover…

2011-01.Vanity Fair.Jackie Kennedy

so this is the culturally current image:

11445

jackie in the yellow dress. jackie silent. jackie looking slightly drugged.

or a variation of april 1961, where she is equally silent and slightly drugged…

XXX_7974_1317225155_1

my work is primarily concerned with the way we engage with the lives of iconic women and with trying to push that engagement in order to reveal the facets of their lives that we’re- willfully???- over-looking.

so the question here, with the way these lives are presented through objects in exhibitions and auctions, is how much biographical baggage we’re bringing to those objects. are the ways in which those objects are presented and the ways we read them pre-determined? and what alternate presentations and readings are missing, where there’s room for an expression of the personality of the owner, her joie de vivre?

must jackie always be poised and ruthlessly curated?

jackie pearls

or can she be messy?

jackie jewels

are marilyn monroe’s things always going to be sad?

Julien+Auctions+Summer+Entertainment+Sale+UkQmwjUQTaFl

and, if so, is this because they’re monroe’s? or because- in light of her image of glamour- the objects associated with her appear bizarrely banal?

article-0-18C9115600000578-634_634x886

monroe using chanel no. 5

Monroe-chanel_1614527i

monroe’s chanel no. 5

these are her clothes:

Marilyn-Monroe-Christies-Auction-1999-1

(via)

where is the joie de vivre?

marilyn monroe milton greene  45

monroe’s clothes look like a rack at american apparel. these are iris aphel’s clothes and they do not:

irisapin fairness, i’m comparing an auction to an exhibition, and those are two entirely different things. marilyn gets auctions rather than exhibitions. but jackie has been the subject of both, and this problem persists.

JFKWHP-KN-C19643

‘lively’ is a word i don’t think anyone would think to apply to the exhibition of her clothes.

yes, there was the shock that a woman so often seen in black and white photographs, in fact, wore brights.

Jacqueline Kennedy Attending Opera in Powder Blue Evening Dress and a LOT o’ pink…

115110-jackie-kennedy-had-a-signature-style Jackie Kennedy - Style jackie1 JBKJFKMalraux XXX_7974_1295986634_1but the clothes were displayed in such an academic way that the fun with which she wore them was stripped.

article-2169327-13F17105000005DC-597_634x547

this…

k18_C1173062 (1)

isn’t this…

nt091008_sn_kyu_iris_1-1024x643

but it could be portrayed more imaginatively than this, right?

Jacqueline Kennedyi continue to be haunted by this:

PADCABFOGNLHPEHA_j

at the time of the exhibit, i actually bought this poster. because i was all PRETTY! CLOTHES! but looking at it now, i find it disturbing. and symptomatic of the problem at play here. looking at this poster, what do you see?

clothes.

and where’s jackie?

untitled5_000this woman who, by all accounts, had a wicked sense of humor and fun?

Aditya21_40267bshe ain’t on that poster.

in contrast, women like isabella blow or iris apfel- women whose biographical baggage, at least in terms of our familiarity with their images and their lives- is significantly lighter can be insistent, vivid presences in the shows dedicated to them.

iris-apfel-corrected1-600x900

at ‘fashion galore’, as i’ve written previously, blow’s presence seemed to inhabit every object, from the clothes to the roladex to the eye-lashes. in contrast, at the jackie clothing exhibit, one might as well have been looking at an artifact from ancient egypt, so remote were the objects on display from a sense of their having once been lived in.

i don’t know that there’s a corrective for this. it may just be that, in their fame, certain aspects of certain people are lost forever and the things they owned and touched and wore become repositories for our own relationships with them.

perhaps because we feel pity for monroe, so her make-up case reads as a tragedy. maybe because we feel distant from jackie, she always seems just out of reach.

Screen shot 2014-03-19 at 10.03.56 AM

perhaps it is only the people we do not know, these women whose stories haven’t been drilled into our heads and woven into the fabric of our history, who can feel real and believable. perhaps it is only they whom we can allow to have truly been alive.

Iris-Apfel-Slide

2 thoughts on “a random appreciation of iris apfel and an accidental continuation of the discourse on fashion exhibits

  1. Pingback: finding jackie (the initial articulation of my philosophy of ‘life-reading’ [+ angst re: the gossip loop v. silence]) | finding jackie

  2. Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely delighted I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back frequently!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s